intrinsic motivation

Realizing our Eudaimonic Potential: Lessons from Dr. Alan Waterman

In this episode of Meaningful Work Matters, Dr. Alan Waterman joins Andrew Soren to unpack what eudaimonia looks like in everyday life, especially when it comes to the work we do.

Dr. Waterman is Professor Emeritus of Psychology at The College of New Jersey. He is widely recognized for his pioneering research on identity, intrinsic motivation, and the distinction between eudaimonic and hedonic well-being. His work brings together philosophy and psychology to explore what it means to live a life of purpose and fulfillment.

Their conversation touches on themes like motivation, personal values, calling versus obligation, and the kind of support individuals need to develop a fulfilling life, whether that fulfillment is found through their job, outside of it, or both.

From Aristotle to Identity: What Is Eudaimonia?

Dr. Waterman explains eudaimonia as the process of realizing our fullest potential.

He draws an important distinction between two kinds of potential. Species-generic potential refers to the abilities and traits that are uniquely human, such as reason, creativity, and moral reflection. Individual-specific potential is about the strengths, values, and capacities that are unique to each person.

Both types matter.

From Waterman’s perspective, fulfillment happens when we develop our own individual strengths within the broader context of what it means to be human. It is not just about performing well, but about growing into the kind of person we are most capable of becoming.

He describes it this way, inspired by the work and research of David Norton:

“Being where one wants to be, doing what one wants to do, where what you are doing is something that is worth doing and worth doing to the best of your ability.”

This definition highlights that living well requires both self-knowledge and effort. We need to know what we are capable of and choose to act on it.

For Waterman, this is what gives life its meaning.

Work as a Calling vs. Work as a Job

One of the clearest applications of eudaimonia to modern life is how we approach work. Waterman distinguishes between work as a calling and work as a job.

  • Work as a calling is intrinsically motivating. It’s often tied to activities or roles to which people feel connected. Not because of pay, status, or convenience, but because they find them worthwhile.

  • Work as a job, by contrast, is usually chosen for practical reasons and tends to be extrinsically motivated. It may be necessary or even enjoyable, but lacks the deeper sense of purpose that defines a calling.

Waterman challenges the notion that callings are rare.

In his view, many people experience a calling: teachers, scientists, first responders, artists, etc. However, they may not always label it as such. He also emphasizes that callings can evolve over time and show up in multiple domains of life, not just in paid employment.

Intrinsic Motivation and Person-Activity Fit

So how do we know what path might lead to fulfillment?

Waterman points to intrinsic motivation as a key signal. The activities, values, or beliefs we feel a natural pull toward are often the ones most aligned with our individual potential.

He encourages us to pay attention to resonance, a term borrowed from music. Just as certain notes create harmony within us, certain tasks, roles, or values feel more aligned with who we are. When we ignore those signals, we may succeed externally but feel disconnected internally.

Waterman also highlights the difference between interpersonal comparisons (how we stack up against others) and intrapersonal comparisons (what we do best among all our own options).

Eudaimonic fulfillment, he argues, comes from the latter.

“We are not here to fulfill someone else’s version of success. The work of a meaningful life is identifying and developing the strengths that resonate most for us.”

Harmonious vs. Obsessive Passion

The conversation also explores a critical distinction in motivation theory: harmonious passion versus obsessive passion.

  • Harmonious passions are intrinsically motivated and additive. They support our overall well-being and integrate well with other areas of life.

  • Obsessive passions on the other hand often involve a rigid attachment to goals or identities. They can lead to burnout, alienation, or the neglect of other important life domains.

Waterman encourages anyone stuck in an obsessive loop to step back and assess what’s working and what’s not. He suggests revisiting earlier moments in life where balance or joy were more present. Oftentimes, rediscovering meaning starts with exposure to something new.

What This Means for Managers and Workplaces

While much of Waterman’s framework focuses on individual awareness and alignment, the conversation closes with a practical discussion about how leaders and organizations can support fulfillment both at work and beyond it.

  • Not all jobs will be intrinsically motivating, and that’s okay. Every person still has the potential to find meaningful expression somewhere in their life.

  • Managers can support employees by creating space for strengths exploration, autonomy, and values alignment even if that expression happens outside the workplace.

  • When employers support the whole person, employees are more likely to feel grounded, satisfied, and capable in their roles.

Soren reflects on how organizations might expand their understanding of growth by including personal development alongside traditional professional development. Together, he and Waterman suggest that fulfillment at work is more likely when people are supported in growing in ways that feel personally meaningful.

Key Ideas to Reflect On

  • Eudaimonia is about realizing your highest potential by making choices that lead to a lasting sense of fulfillment.

  • Intrinsic motivation and alignment with personal values are reliable signals that you are on a path toward self-realization.

  • Work can be experienced as a calling, a job, or something in between. Each orientation has its place, depending on context and individual goals.

  • When employers support employee fulfillment outside of work, it can lead to greater well-being, motivation, and performance on the job.

Final Thoughts

From Waterman’s point of view, meaningful work is about recognizing your unique strengths, aligning with your values, and having the opportunity to express what matters most to you.

His insights are a reminder that fulfillment comes from choosing what is worth doing and committing to doing it well. This applies just as much to individuals seeking more purpose in their work as it does to leaders responsible for creating environments where people can thrive.

Resources for Further Exploration

When Work Becomes a Moral Imperative: Lessons from Mijeong Kwon

Mijeong Kwon, PhD, is an Assistant Professor of Management at the University of Colorado Denver Business School. Her research focuses on the social dynamics of work motivation, particularly how people communicate and judge motivations for work.

Dr. Kwon's recent findings suggest that those who love their work often see this intrinsic motivation as a moral virtue while viewing working for money or recognition as less moral. She explores how this moralization of motivation can alienate colleagues and hinder the recognition of diverse work motivations.

The Moralization of Intrinsic Motivation

Kwon introduces the concept of the moralization of intrinsic motivation and explains that it involves attaching positive values to intrinsic motivation.

Intrinsic motivation refers to engaging in work because it is inherently enjoyable or satisfying. When individuals moralize intrinsic motivation, they begin to view it as the "right" reason to work, while other motivations, such as financial gain or fame, may be seen as less virtuous or even wrong.

Positive and Negative Outcomes of Moralizing Intrinsic Motivation

Kwon's research highlights both the positive and negative consequences of moralizing intrinsic motivation. On the positive side, individuals who moralize intrinsic motivation are more likely to possess and cultivate it in others, leading to increased intrinsic motivation within an organization. This can result in higher levels of engagement, satisfaction, and overall performance among employees.

However, there are also significant negative outcomes. For instance, individuals who moralize intrinsic motivation may experience guilt if they struggle to maintain their intrinsic motivation. This can lead to unnecessary stress and self-doubt, even if they are performing well at their jobs. Additionally, moralizing intrinsic motivation can cause individuals to neglect less interesting but essential tasks, potentially leading to self-exploitation and burnout.

Cultural Differences in Intrinsic Motivation

Kwon's research also explores cultural differences in intrinsic motivation.

She observes that people in the United States generally report high levels of intrinsic motivation, while it is lower in East Asia. Interestingly, intrinsic motivation levels in Latin America are even higher than in the United States. This suggests that the phenomenon of moralizing intrinsic motivation is not limited to one specific culture but may be prevalent in various regions around the world.

Implications for Managers and Leaders

Based on her findings, Kwon offers several recommendations for managers and leaders.

Firstly, she advises acknowledging and validating different reasons why employees work. Leaders should share personal stories that highlight the various benefits of their job, such as flexibility, to validate diverse motivations.

Secondly, Kwon suggests creating an environment that sustains and cultivates intrinsic motivation rather than emphasizing it directly. This can be achieved by providing low-risk learning opportunities and practicing transformative leadership to inspire employees.

Lastly, she emphasizes the importance of having clear guidelines for performance appraisal to avoid subjective value judgments. This helps ensure that employees are not left guessing about how they will be evaluated or feeling pressured to work excessive hours to demonstrate their passion.

The Role of Purpose in Organizations

Soren and Kwon discuss the increasing emphasis on purpose in organizations, particularly through initiatives such as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) priorities, and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

While these efforts are generally seen as positive, Kwon cautions that they can also lead to the moralization of intrinsic motivation, which may have unintended negative consequences.

Kwon notes that in nonprofit organizations, where employees are often intrinsically motivated and paid less, there is a higher likelihood of moralizing intrinsic motivation. This can result in difficulties finding equally passionate colleagues and may lead to feelings of frustration and isolation among employees.

Diversity of Motivations in the Workplace

One key takeaway from the conversation is the importance of recognizing and valuing a diversity of motivations in the workplace. Soren and Kwon agree that having employees with different motivations, including those driven by utilitarian reasons, can create a stronger and more balanced team. Such diversity can help maintain boundaries and ensure employees do not become overly consumed by their work.

Kwon also mentions that organizations that emphasize both financial success and broader social goals tend to attract more employees. When employees know that the profits of a company will directly benefit them or other stakeholders, they are more likely to feel a sense of reciprocity and be motivated to contribute to the organization's success.

Final Thoughts

While intrinsic motivation can lead to greater engagement and satisfaction, moralizing it can negatively affect individuals and organizations. Managers and leaders should strive to create an inclusive work environment that acknowledges and values diverse motivations while providing clear performance guidelines and fostering a sense of purpose that benefits all stakeholders.

References

For more information on the topics discussed in this podcast episode, you can visit the following links: